tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14442178.post113037687421141077..comments2024-03-25T08:08:23.132-07:00Comments on Who Has Time For This?: 2 B or not 2 B?David Cowanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13075075203254308405noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14442178.post-1130873429067840922005-11-01T11:30:00.000-08:002005-11-01T11:30:00.000-08:00Hi David,I guess the question is when is bubble-sp...Hi David,<BR/><BR/>I guess the question is when is bubble-speak a precursor to a looming burst and when is it just reflective of a meme that propagates really well?<BR/><BR/>Personally, I think the latter case is at work since SOOO many people are talking bubble, yet my thesis suggests that the marriage of digital media, applied web services and the RSS-powered blogosphere is just starting the second quarter.<BR/><BR/>For what it's worth, I wrote a post called 'Bubbles, backlash and grim reapers' that puts the topic under the microscope a bit and also provides links to recent posts by others that espouse the bubble argument.<BR/><BR/>Here is the URL if you are interested in such things: http://thenetworkgarden.blogs.com/weblog/2005/10/bubbles_backlas.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14442178.post-1130690082429919752005-10-30T08:34:00.000-08:002005-10-30T08:34:00.000-08:00Have you read Nick Carr's musings on the "religiou...Have you read Nick Carr's musings on the "religious" aspects of Schmeb 2.0? You should also read Spolsky poking fun at the associated technobabble.<BR/><BR/>(links to both at: http://dreymann.blogspot.com/2005/10/religion-920.html)Daniel Dreymannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15825694566848237181noreply@blogger.com